History of Linux
How it all started?
- With GNU (GNU is not UNIX)
- Richard Stallman made the initial announcement in 1983, Free Software Foundation (FSF) got formed during 1984
- Volunteer driven GNU started developing multiple projects, but making it as an operating system was always a challenge
- During 1991 a Finnish Engineer Linus Torvalds developed core OS functionality, called it as “Linux Kernel”
- Linux Kernel got licensed under GPL, which laid strong platform for the success of Open Source, Rest is history!
How it evolved?
- Multiple Linux distributions started emerging around the Kernel
- Some applications became platform independent
- Community driven software development started picking up
- Initially seen as a “geek-phenomenon”, eventually turned out to be an engineering marvel
- Centered around Internet
- Building a business around open source started becoming viable
- Redhat set the initial trend in the OS business
Open Source SW vs. Freeware
Open Source Software. |
Freeware Software |
1. Users have the right to access & modify the source codes |
1. Freeware is usually distributed in a form of binary at ‘Free of Charge’, but does not open source codes itself. |
2.
In case original programmer disappeared, users & developer group of
the Software, usually keep its support to the Software. |
2. Developer of freeware could abandon development at any time and
then final version will be the last version of the freeware. No
enhancements will be made by others. |
3. OSS usually has the strong users & developers group that manage and does maintains the project. |
3. Possibility of changing its licensing policy. |
GPL - General Public Licence
- Basic rights under the GPL – access to source code, right to make derivative works
- Reciprocity/Copy-left
- Purpose is to increase amount of publicly available software and ensure compatibility
- Licensees have right to modify, use or distribute software, and to access the source code
Problems with the GPL
- Linking to GPL programs
- No explicit patent grant
- Does no discuss trademark rights
- Does not discuss duration
- Silent on sub-licensing
- Relies exclusively on license law, not contract
Post a Comment